Market insight in association witH

Hernia meshes allegedly used without clinical evidence

Hernia repair is one of the world’s most common surgical procedures.


A hernia occurs when body organs or fatty tissues protrude out of any wall or opening of the surrounding muscles. The most common site of hernia occurrence is the groin. Hernias are visible as bulges or lumps through the skin. They occur due to surgical wounds, weaknesses in the muscles, or birth defects.


One common way to repair hernias is with the use of meshes. A mesh is a surgical implant used to give extra support to the hernia-affected tissues. These meshes can be made from a variety of materials.


GlobalData classifies these as synthetic meshes, composite meshes, or biological meshes. Synthetic meshes are made of synthetic materials such as polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), polypropylene (PP), or polyester (PET). These materials have high tensile strength and may be absorbable or non-absorbable depending on the material used.


Composite meshes are double-layered meshes with an absorbable side and a non-absorbable side. The absorbable side of the mesh is placed in contact with the hernia and allows tissue growth to strengthen the weakened abdominal wall, while the non-absorbable material prevents adhesion to the intestine. Biologic meshes are made from tissues of different animals such as cows (bovine pericardium) or pigs (porcine intestinal submucosal layer). These biological materials are high in collagen fibres and allow the native cells to populate and develop connective tissues, which allows for tissue growth in the weakened hernia.


While most hernia repair procedures are successful, it is estimated that about 10% of patients experience complications such as infections, pain, or organ damage. Since most hernia repair procedures are meant to be permanent, only a small number of these patients are eligible to have hernia meshes removed in a process that could result in further complications. Recently, experts have indicated that sufficient clinical testing is not always performed for hernia meshes. In some cases, meshes were only tested on animals for a few days, and therefore do not properly assess the potential long-term effects of mesh implants.


A report by the BBC found that over 100 different meshes are used by the UK’s National Health Service (NHS), but many of these devices did not undergo adequate clinical testing, with very few clinical trials having been conducted. As a result, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) has stated that it will be on alert for any new information about faulty hernia repair meshes and will promote new regulations to ensure the safety of these medical devices, including requiring manufacturers to provide clinical evidence demonstrating the safety and effectiveness for marketed products used by patients.

For more insight and data, visit the GlobalData Report Store.

Go to article: Home | When Treatments Turn ToxicGo to article: In This Issue Go to article: BioInteractions Company Insight Go to article: BioInteractions Go to article: ContentsGo to article: Formacoat Company InsightGo to article: FormacoatGo to article: NewsGo to article: Tricor SystemsGo to article: The Medical Industry BriefingGo to article: RPMC Lasers Go to article: Health screening: the need for a more proactive approachGo to article: Mi3 Medical IntelligenceGo to article: Can AI make healthcare more human?Go to article: Swisstec 3DGo to article: Combining virtual reality and touch for surgical training Go to article: Accurate Biometrics Company InsightGo to article: Accurate BiometricsGo to article: A nose for trouble: the bio-sensor aiming to sniff out diseaseGo to article: PI Ceramic Company Insight Go to article: PI CeramicGo to article: Elcam MedicalGo to article: Empowerment vs deceit: the darker side of digital health communitiesGo to article: Sandvik Company InsightGo to article: Sandvik Go to article: What’s the solution to the ethylene oxide crisis?Go to article: General PlasticsGo to article: Ocean Insight Company InsightGo to article: Ocean InsightGo to article: SanminaGo to article:  Q&A: talking clinical trial tech and acquisitions with MedidataGo to article: Caeleste Company Insight Go to article: CaelesteGo to article: Not very re-Essureing: how a contraceptive implant can ruin livesGo to article: Apple RubberGo to article: axxosGo to article: Lessons and leftover challenges from MDR preparationsGo to article: maxonGo to article: micrometal Go to article: Role of wearable sensors in the early diagnosis of Graft Versus Host DiseaseGo to article: MedtecLIVEGo to article: Predicting influenza outbreak using Fitbit wearable technologyGo to article: Schurter Go to article: ESMAGo to article: AccumoldGo to article: Potential use of light-degradable medical devices in gastrointestinal proceduresGo to article: Smiths InterconnectGo to article: Hernia meshes allegedly used without clinical evidenceGo to article: MPS Microsystems Company InsightGo to article: MPS MicrosystemsGo to article: JenaValve advances TAVR programme with FDA breakthrough device designationGo to article: Deals in brief powered by GlobaldataGo to article: Micro Systems TechnologiesGo to article: The key list powered by GlobaldataGo to article: Abatek InternationalGo to article: EventsGo to article: Next Issue