Regulation

FDA warns of false results in genetic non-invasive prenatal testing

Neither the accuracy nor the efficacy of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has been authorised, cleared or approved by the FDA, GlobalData reports.

Congenital abnormalities are the leading cause of infant mortality worldwide; therefore, the use of prenatal screening in developed countries is common to detect chromosomal abnormalities and neural tube defects. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently issued a safety communications article informing healthcare professionals and patients of the dangers associated with genetic non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) or screening (NIPS) tests.


NIPTs highlight the possible risk of a foetus having certain genetic abnormalities by analysing small fragments of fetal DNA found in blood drawn from a pregnant person. While NIPTs are often used by healthcare professionals, neither their accuracy nor their efficacy has been authorised, cleared or approved by the FDA.


Importantly, there have been reports where pregnancies have been terminated due to false results indicating genetic abnormalities based on the results of NIPTs alone. Since NIPS are not definitive in nature, as they only tell the potential risk of the foetus having a genetic disorder, it is important to pair their test results with a diagnostic test.


The prenatal screening market is estimated to reach $1.65bn by 2030 at a negative compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 2.1%. Since the FDA is encouraging increased vigilance in using NIPTs, GlobalData predicts a greater decrease in the NIPT market, as healthcare professionals and patients practice caution, and an increase in market share by other competing laboratory-based tests. There may, potentially, be an increase in prenatal diagnostic testing such as foetal echocardiograms and foetal blood sampling, as healthcare professionals pair these with NIPTs. Although these false negatives have been addressed only by the FDA, the US is the largest consumer of NIPTs and will thus reflect an overall decline in the NIPT market.

Main image: JHVEPhoto / Shutterstock.com

Go to article: Home | Taming the Wild WestGo to article: In this issueGo to article: ContentsGo to article: Formacoat Company InsightGo to article: FormacoatGo to article: BriefingGo to article: Industry newsGo to article: The medical industry briefingGo to article: Covid-19 executive briefing by GlobalDataGo to article: Apple RubberGo to article: facultyGo to article: CommentGo to article: Russian import of essential medical devices to continue, but in reduced volumesGo to article: AI technology impacts gynaecological ultrasound by detecting preterm birthGo to article: FDA warns of false results in genetic non-invasive prenatal testingGo to article: Solid State Supplies Company Insight Go to article: TS Quality & EngineeringGo to article: In DepthGo to article: Taming the Wild West: regulating digital health appsGo to article: Covid-19: Mental health app growth reveals unmet needsGo to article: Remote clinical trial monitoring uptake rises but validation questions swirlGo to article: Covid-19 spurred on the self-testing revolutionGo to article: Is FDA LDT surveillance set to improve as VALID Act heads to resolution?Go to article: WatlowGo to article: Sandvik Company InsightGo to article: Sandvik Go to article: In DataGo to article: Where is trade most likely to be disrupted in the medical industry from the RussGo to article: How big is the gender pay gap in the medical industry in Britain and who are the worst offenders?Go to article: SartoriusGo to article: mdi ConsultantsGo to article: MikronGo to article: EventsGo to article: Next Issue