Share

Market insight in association with

AI demonstrates human-level capacity to diagnose disease

A joint research effort, published on 24 September in the journal Lancet Digital Health, conducted by researchers in the UK, Germany, Switzerland and the US suggest that image-based artificial intelligence (AI) disease diagnosis performance is comparable to healthcare professionals.

Deep learning diagnostics

The study analysed the results of papers published between 2012 and 2019 that directly compared the diagnostic accuracy of deep learning models to healthcare professionals and found the accuracy rate for AI diagnoses was 87% compared to 86.4% for healthcare professionals.


Deep learning diagnostics holds immense potential to enhance both the speed and accuracy of disease diagnoses. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has already approved several products in this space, such as IDx-DR (IDx Technologies Inc.), which detects diabetic retinopathy through deep learning methods, and the Viz.ai Contact application (Viz.ai, Inc.), which can diagnose large vessel occlusion strokes. AI-based innovations bring the promise of high levels of diagnostic accuracy and speed, which in the case of stroke can be vital to positive patient outcomes.


While the authors of the meta-analysis study indicate that AI-based frameworks can perform on par with professionals in the field, they emphasised the lack of clinically relevant evaluation and direct head-to-head comparisons between AI and professionals throughout the vast majority of the literature. 


However, the authors also note that the most recently published papers in the field tended to include both of these evaluation criteria. Growing confidence in AI-based diagnostics is expected to drive new competitors into the space to enhance disease diagnostic capabilities. The potential of standardised accuracy and cost-saving measures of AI-based disease diagnostic frameworks will drive further adoption of these products.

For more insight and data, visit the GlobalData Report Store.

Go to article: Home | Hey Alexa: what are the symptoms of...?Go to article: In This Issue Go to article: MPS Microsystems Company InsightGo to article: MPS MicrosystemsGo to article: ContentsGo to article: Sandvik Company InsightGo to article: Sandvik Go to article: NewsGo to article: MicronovaGo to article: The Medical Industry BriefingGo to article: Formacoat Company InsightGo to article: FormacoatGo to article: Future diabetes care: deep brain stimulation and implanted insulinGo to article: Siemens Company Insight Go to article: Siemens Go to article: Roundtable: choosing a contract device manufacturerGo to article: Telemed Company InsightGo to article: TelemedGo to article: Debate: Can Alexa be trusted with our health questions?Go to article: MikronGo to article: HeartFlow Analysis: a better way to diagnose heart disease? Go to article: Tricor SystemsGo to article: The Promise of Neurotechnology Go to article: Laser Wire Solutions Company InsightGo to article: Laser Wire SolutionsGo to article: Cashing in on fertility: should femtech receive more scrutiny?Go to article: Accurate Biometrics Company InsightGo to article: Accurate BiometricsGo to article: Q&A: Ready player one: booting up the prescription video gameGo to article: SartoriusGo to article: Omnitron Go to article: Q&A: an inside look at medtech venture capital with VesaliusGo to article: AerogelexGo to article: CarmoGo to article: Electronic ‘nose’ can predict response to lung cancer immunotherapyGo to article: TreskyGo to article: Smiths InterconnectGo to article: AI demonstrates human-level capacity to diagnose diseaseGo to article: Maraca InternationalGo to article: Axonics Modulation Technologies emerges as a major player in sacral neuromodulationGo to article: OptelGo to article: CMR Surgical joins surgical robots battle with next generation VersiusGo to article: Art of TechnologyGo to article: First long-distance PCI procedure in India opens an opportunity for untapped patient poolGo to article: EventsGo to article: Next Issue